On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:33:11PM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:04:12PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > > It won't. Right now we have 2.4.22 available via bitkeeper from > > xfs.org, Russell posted this on the list a while ago. The crypto merge > > into 2.4.22 means hosting it on an SGI web site takes some approvals. > > I'm curious: will it make sense to release split patches for 2.4.22 like > those available for 2.4.21, even if CVS doesn't have the full 2.4.22-xfs it would make a lot of sense, it would allow people to easily upgrade to 2.4.22 now. > yet while waiting for the approval due to the crypto merge? Or will > split patches for 2.4.22 require the same approval anyway? the patches won't contain any crypto, thus don't require any approval. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgp00018.pgp
Description: PGP signature