[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: vnodeops



On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 05:19:08AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> So is there any reason to keep the vnodeops layer around?  There's only
> one implementation of it (xfs_vnodeops) so it seems kind of pointless.
> Removing it would probably shrink xfs quite a bit, both source and binary.

i believe its used for CXFS.

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgp00004.pgp
Description: PGP signature