[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: use-after-free in xfs_bawrite()

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: use-after-free in xfs_bawrite()
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 14:15:43 +0200
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20030802050919.2c43cd6f.akpm@osdl.org>
References: <20030802013032.7a42a596.akpm@osdl.org> <20030802115458.GA21440@wotan.suse.de> <20030802050919.2c43cd6f.akpm@osdl.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com

> > > Seems that dbench is not XFS's favourite benchmark.  How come?  Do I need
> > > more logbufs?
> > 
> > And bigger on disk log than by default.  There is a patch in the queue to do 
> > the first, but I think it hasn't reached Linus' tree yet.
> > 
> 
> Your patch has been merged, and is in the tree I tested.

I would still increase the on disk log size. The old defaults are showing
their age.

-andi

References:
- use-after-free in xfs_bawrite()
  - From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: use-after-free in xfs_bawrite()
  - From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: use-after-free in xfs_bawrite()
  - From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>

Prev by Date: Re: use-after-free in xfs_bawrite()
Next by Date: TAKE - acl/attr fixes
Previous by thread: Re: use-after-free in xfs_bawrite()
Next by thread: Re: use-after-free in xfs_bawrite()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread