[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: default quota limits in linux (via quotactl())
- To: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@metzemix.de>
- Subject: Re: default quota limits in linux (via quotactl())
- From: Walt H <waltabbyh@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 07:18:42 -0800
- Cc: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>, viro@math.psu.edu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@zip.com.au, Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jfs-discussion@www-124.southbury.usf.ibm.com, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net>
- In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030128142729.0218f398@post.webmailer.de>
- References: <20030128112034.GA23731@f00f.org> <5.2.0.9.2.20030127150905.0217e170@post.strato.de> <5.2.0.9.2.20030127150905.0217e170@post.strato.de> <5.2.0.9.2.20030128074810.0218c4f8@post.webmailer.de> <20030128093250.GM28513@vagabond> <20030128094014.GA23257@f00f.org> <20030128094619.GO28513@vagabond> <20030128101310.GA23320@f00f.org> <20030128105747.GR28513@vagabond> <20030128112034.GA23731@f00f.org> <5.2.0.9.2.20030128142729.0218f398@post.webmailer.de>
- Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030121
I believe that the hotplug stuff does this. When a new hotpluggable pci,
usb etc... device is plugged into the system, it triggers /sbin/hotplug
to run to look for the appropriate kernel module to provide a driver.
-Walt
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> At 13:37 28.01.2003 +0100, Jan Hudec wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 03:20:34AM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:57:47AM +0100, Jan Hudec wrote:
>> >
>> > > So you can only setquota for the users that actualy log in
>> >
>> > the API allows you to set quota for any valid uid/gid
>>
>> Yes, it does. But since there is many more valid users than those
>> actualy using the system, you don't want to... And a logged in user is
>> sure valid, so no problem there, right?
>>
>> > > Well, it get's complicated, but you still can setquota in the local
>> > > delivery process... I know it get's a bit complicated...
>> >
>> > sure, this is a perfectly legitimate argument and a fairly reasonable
>> > solution to this case
>>
>> If it finaly got too complicated, you could add a simple code to kernel,
>> that would run_usermodehelper and provide a user mode program to fix
>> things up. That might even get a chance of being accepted. (And it would
>> be more flexible since it can get the default quota from LDAP etc...)
>
>
> is there an example( another place in the kernel where the kernel
> callback a userspace tool)
>
> can you point me to the place (the function) where the quota
> entry/object will be created for new users,
> so this should be the location where the userspace tool should be
> callback...
>
> that would be a cool solution, witch I could accept too:-)
>
>
>
>
> metze
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Stefan "metze" Metzmacher <metze@metzemix.de>
>