Re: xfs vs. jfs results: why?

[Seth Mos <knuffie@xs4all.nl>]

At 19:20 19-1-2003 -0800, LA Walsh wrote:
>CONCLUSION:
>We are not able to reproduce the excellent numbers described at:
>http://home.fnal.gov/~yocum/storageServerTechnicalNote.html
>It appears that the best performance for read-orientated and mixed
>workloads is obtained with JFS, for write-orientated XFS.
>---
> From page: http://pcbunn.cacr.caltech.edu/gae/3ware_raid_tests.htm

Since you are using 2.4.19. Did you compile this kernel with HIGMEM and 
HIGHMEM IO?

There have been some performance problems in 2.4.19 if you did not have 
HIGHMEM IO turned on.

Can you check this please?

Cheers

--
Seth
It might just be your lucky day, if you only knew.