On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 07:03:09AM -0500, Stephen Lord wrote: > > The compiler is > > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs > > gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease) > > This is exactly the same compiler as appears to be the cause of > the other problem. I wish we had the window narrowed down to less > than 5 weeks, a LOT of things have changed in XFS in that interval. I know that #===== NOTE ===== # egcs-2.91.66 is the recommended compiler version for building XFS. # Most of the XFS developers are using that particular version for and I also know that a lot of people compile XFS with other versions of the compiler. I do compile it with gcc-2.95.x for almost a year now. Would it be a good idea to have a poll to get a feel of what the users out here compile XFS with, and try to steer the main developers/testers onto that direction? Or decide that gcc-3.1 is the "wave" of the future and try to make it usable? florin I know your first reaction will be "these are the resources we have" and "contribute something before asking for something" but I am using XFS since last summer and reported the occasional glitches I encountered (not many, THANK YOU!). Also my load it fairly light - browsing, mail... so it is not representative enough. -- "NT is to UNIX what a dougnut is to a particle accelerator." 41A9 2BDE 8E11 F1C5 87A6 03EE 34B3 E075 3B90 DFE4
Attachment:
pgp00039.pgp
Description: PGP signature