[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fragmentation (was: XFS NFS server Oops)

To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Fragmentation (was: XFS NFS server Oops)
From: Rupa Schomaker <rupa-list@rupa.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 21:19:49 -0800
Cancel-lock: sha1:taiaHf/G/3Kl1mzvJZX26gRLcJA=
Mail-copies-to: never
Mailbox-line: From rupa-list@rupa.com Tue Mar 19 21:19:50 2002
References: <1016578034.28166.25.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203200925430.8497-100000@gusi.leathercollection.ph>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)

Federico Sevilla III <jijo@leathercollection.ph> writes:

> I got fragmentation factors from a high of 50.92% (this is a filesystem
> where I store huge tar.gz backups and not much else) to a low of 0.43% for
> my / filesystem.

I've got a filesystem with 28 .iso images, the frags -f command shows:

# xfs_db -r /dev/shaktivg/xxx
xfs_db: frag -f
actual 355, ideal 29, fragmentation factor 91.83%

yikes...

-- 
-rupa

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fragmentation (was: XFS NFS server Oops)
  - From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>

References:
- Re: XFS NFS server Oops
  - From: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
- Fragmentation (was: XFS NFS server Oops)
  - From: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@leathercollection.ph>

Prev by Date: Re: Fragmentation (was: XFS NFS server Oops)
Next by Date: Re: kernel RPMs
Previous by thread: Re: Fragmentation (was: XFS NFS server Oops)
Next by thread: Re: Fragmentation (was: XFS NFS server Oops)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread