[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Distributed File Systems. Which is best?

To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?
From: pac@fortuitous.com
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:37:49 -0600
In-reply-to: <20011107212340.A25294@bistro.marx>
References: <85063BBE668FD411944400D0B744267A88872A@AUSMAIL> <20011107212340.A25294@bistro.marx>
Reply-to: pac@fortuitous.com
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.25i

  
  Anyone use or care about:

 a. Coda
 b. Intermezzo

  Does Coda have its own filesystem, or does it use an underlying FS?
 Intermezzo tries to use the underlying FS.

 What are the advantages/disadvantages to each from your perspective? 

  Thanks,

-Phil Carinhas
--
 .--------------------------------------------------------.
 | Dr. Philip A. Carinhas       | pac@fortuitous.com      |
 | Fortuitous Technologies Inc. | http://fortuitous.com   |
 | Linux Consulting & Training  | Tel : 1-512-467-2154    |
 `--------------------------------------------------------'

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?
  - From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?
  - From: Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>

Prev by Date: write event
Next by Date: Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?
Previous by thread: write event
Next by thread: Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread