[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?

To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?
From: "Adam McKenna" <adam-dated-1015976289.ad9bed@flounder.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 15:38:09 -0800
In-reply-to: <20020307155030.E7904@aem.umn.edu>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
References: <E631530D51ABD411B823009027855C5B0277CA@THOR> <20020307153401.B7904@aem.umn.edu> <20020307212830.GX17914@flounder.net> <20020307155030.E7904@aem.umn.edu>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.27i

On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 03:50:31PM -0600, Ray Muno wrote:
> I am not using it as a benchmark.  This is just in followup to the person
> who posted that they observed kernel compile times that seemed to be 
> extremely long on a machine with RAID and XFS. 

Yes, I noticed after you sent it that you weren't the original poster.  Sorry
about that.  But still, kernel compile time is a pretty poor gauge for
measuring filesystem performance.

--Adam

References:
- RE: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?
  - From: Murthy Kambhampaty <Murthy.Kambhampaty@goeci.com>
- Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?
  - From: Ray Muno <muno@aem.umn.edu>
- Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?
  - From: "Adam McKenna" <adam-dated-1015968510.b72b9d@flounder.net>
- Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?
  - From: Ray Muno <muno@aem.umn.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: xfs_copy
Next by Date: Re: Serveral weid errors on sys_sparc32.c
Previous by thread: Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?
Next by thread: Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread