[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: oops umounting full LVM snapshots

To: "Stephenson, Dale" <dstephenson@snapserver.com>
Subject: RE: oops umounting full LVM snapshots
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sgi.com>
Date: 26 Feb 2002 13:42:28 -0600
Cc: "'linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com'" <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>
In-reply-to: <2D0AFEFEE711D611923E009027D39F2B02F0C0@cdserv.meridian-data.com>
References: <2D0AFEFEE711D611923E009027D39F2B02F0C0@cdserv.meridian-data.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 12:48, Stephenson, Dale wrote:

> The only difference remaining I can see from your test and my last test is
> that I made my volume group from a single IDE drive partition, not two scsi
> partitions.

...and that was the crucial difference.  Mine falls down now, too. 
Drat.  :)

-Eric

-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@sgi.com   SGI, Inc.

References:
- RE: oops umounting full LVM snapshots
  - From: "Stephenson, Dale" <dstephenson@snapserver.com>

Prev by Date: RE: oops umounting full LVM snapshots
Next by Date: RE: oops umounting full LVM snapshots
Previous by thread: RE: oops umounting full LVM snapshots
Next by thread: RE: oops umounting full LVM snapshots
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread