[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RAID5 internal log question

To: Mihai RUSU <dizzy@roedu.net>
Subject: Re: RAID5 internal log question
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@linuxcare.com>
Date: 15 Feb 2002 16:20:32 -0500
Cc: Linux XFS List <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202152301270.31300-100000@ahriman.bucharest.roedu.net>
Organization: Linuxcare, Inc.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202152301270.31300-100000@ahriman.bucharest.roedu.net>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service)

>>>>> "Mihai" == Mihai RUSU <dizzy@roedu.net> writes:

Mihai> From the XFS FAQ and other threads on this list I understand
Mihai> that is recommended to have the log of an XFS partition out of
Mihai> a RAID5. Is that performance impact that bad also with hardware
Mihai> RAID ?  

No.  Only with Linux Software RAID5 because of the way it does stripe
caching.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc.
mkp@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/
SGI XFS for Linux Developer, http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/

References:
- RAID5 internal log question
  - From: Mihai RUSU <dizzy@roedu.net>

Prev by Date: RAID5 internal log question
Next by Date: dm_handle_to_path
Previous by thread: RAID5 internal log question
Next by thread: Re: RAID5 internal log question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread