Re: Current status of 2.5.x

[Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>]

Also it must be shown that lvm in 2.5 will be worked on, but there was
word from sistna when the released lvm2, that a port would happen at a
later time. I think it's best to ask directly on that list. Probably
even Heinz himself.

On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 12:33, Stephen Lord wrote:
> Vernon McPherron wrote:
> 
> > I haven't been following the 2.5.x branch lately.  Does the XFS CVS 
> > branch support LVM and MD, or does it still need work?  I understood 
> > that early 2.5 trees the vfs was quite different from the 2.4 vfs.
> >
> > I guess this should really go to the Kernel mailing list, just curious
> 
> > to know of those using the 2.5 cvs tree are using LVM & MD.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -=/Vernon McPherron/=-
> 
> So far as I know, md in 2.5 should be working, lvm is totally broken, 
> and no one is attempting
> to fix it. Sistina shows no sign of working on it, they released a 
> rewrite of lvm in 2.4 instead.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@coremetrics.com

"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
Latin Proverb