[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Current status of 2.5.x

To: Vernon McPherron <vernon@xnote.com>
Subject: Re: Current status of 2.5.x
From: Stephen Lord <lord@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:33:16 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
References: <3C680C6D.9070708@xnote.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226

Vernon McPherron wrote:

> I haven't been following the 2.5.x branch lately.  Does the XFS CVS 
> branch support LVM and MD, or does it still need work?  I understood 
> that early 2.5 trees the vfs was quite different from the 2.4 vfs.
>
> I guess this should really go to the Kernel mailing list, just curious 
> to know of those using the 2.5 cvs tree are using LVM & MD.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -=/Vernon McPherron/=-

So far as I know, md in 2.5 should be working, lvm is totally broken, 
and no one is attempting
to fix it. Sistina shows no sign of working on it, they released a 
rewrite of lvm in 2.4 instead.

Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Current status of 2.5.x
  - From: Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>
- Re: Current status of 2.5.x
  - From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>

References:
- Current status of 2.5.x
  - From: Vernon McPherron <vernon@xnote.com>

Prev by Date: Current status of 2.5.x
Next by Date: TAKE - deal with stale pagebufs
Previous by thread: Current status of 2.5.x
Next by thread: Re: Current status of 2.5.x
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread