[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: productionserver

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: productionserver
From: Thomas Kirk <thomas@arkena.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 17:48:41 +0200
Cc: Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20010823170101.033dd450@pop.xs4all.nl>; from knuffie@xs4all.nl on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:10:50PM +0200
References: <20010823164506.A9758@mmstreaming.dk> <4.3.2.7.2.20010823170101.033dd450@pop.xs4all.nl>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:10:50PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote:

> XFS is nice for larger file sizes and also seems to do reasonably well when 
> using large databases.

Our HW diskarray are gonna be aprox 500gb and we will run raid5 on top
of that.Any considerations i should do if deploying XFS for the server?

BTW i seem to get 2 copies of all the mails from this list?

-- 
Venlig hilsen/Kind regards
Thomas Kirk
ARKENA
thomas@arkena.com
Http://www.arkena.com

"World domination.  Fast"
(By Linus Torvalds)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: productionserver
  - From: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@leathercollection.ph>
- Re: productionserver
  - From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xs4all.nl>

References:
- productionserver
  - From: Thomas Kirk <thomas@arkena.com>
- Re: productionserver
  - From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xs4all.nl>

Prev by Date: Root Aliases & Lock-ups on Mount w/ Initrd (was Re: initrd: couldn'tumount)
Next by Date: Re: productionserver
Previous by thread: Re: productionserver
Next by thread: Re: productionserver
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread