[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: XFS memory hardening

To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re[2]: XFS memory hardening
From: Keith Matthews <keith_m@sweeney.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:56:18 +0100 (BST)
In-reply-to: <200108150324.f7F3OmN23615@jen.americas.sgi.com>
References: <20010815051128.A9849@fred.local>,<200108150324.f7F3OmN23615@jen.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 22:24:48 -0500 Steve Lord <Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>> wrote:

> hey, we had no phones today at work, just a hydrogen sulphide smell 
> which they assured us was at an extremely low and safe concentration!

OT but, I'm told by experts in the field that its just objectionable
until it starts to smell sweet. Then you need to get the hell out of there.



--
Keith Matthews 			Spam trap - my real account at this 
							node is keith_m
Frequentous Consultants  - Linux Services, 
		Oracle development & database administration

References:
- re: XFS memory hardening
  - From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
- Re: XFS memory hardening
  - From: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>

Prev by Date: Re: New tarball error
Next by Date: TAKE - Fix ABBA deadlock, the better version
Previous by thread: Re: XFS memory hardening
Next by thread: setfacl problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread