[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: non-standard errno: -990

To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: non-standard errno: -990
From: Andrew Klaassen <ak@dkp.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:51:51 -0400
In-reply-to: <20010809095021.A260586@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
References: <20010808160948.D21284@dkp.com> <20010808223713.A1669@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <20010808170000.E21284@dkp.com> <20010809095021.A260586@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i

On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 09:50:21AM +1000, 
Nathan Scott wrote:

> Only other suggestion would be to unmount and see what kind of
> corruption xfs_repair picks up.

I might be able to do that on the weekend.

(Ugh.  This working on the weekend thing is becoming a little
too common for me...)

Andrew Klaassen

References:
- non-standard errno: -990
  - From: Andrew Klaassen <ak@dkp.com>
- Re: non-standard errno: -990
  - From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: non-standard errno: -990
  - From: Andrew Klaassen <ak@dkp.com>
- Re: non-standard errno: -990
  - From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>

Prev by Date: Re: non-standard errno: -990
Next by Date: OT: WMware beta
Previous by thread: Re: non-standard errno: -990
Next by thread: Re: non-standard errno: -990
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread