[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Busy inodes after umount

To: Ragnar Kjørstad <xfs@ragnark.vestdata.no>
Subject: Re: Busy inodes after umount
From: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 13:30:22 -0500
Cc: Tony Gale <gale@syntax.dera.gov.uk>, Tad Dolphay <tbd@sgi.com>, mjacob@feral.com, Christian Chip <chip.christian@storageapps.com>, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Comments: In-reply-to Ragnar Kjørstad <xfs@ragnark.vestdata.no> message dated "Wed, 01 Aug 2001 20:05:50 +0200."
References: <20010719165758.D50024-100000@wonky.feral.com> <200107200038.TAA40153@fsgi158.americas.sgi.com> <20010731021546.A7750@vestdata.no> <996653920.2941.0.camel@syntax.dera.gov.uk> <20010801200550.B30796@vestdata.no>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com

> On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:18:40AM +0100, Tony Gale wrote:
> > Do you have any other patches in your kernel, such as grsecurity?
> 
> The only patch I have is the xfs patch.
> 
> 

I thought Trond pointed to a patch on linux-kernel this morning:

The NLM lock reclaiming code in the stock 2.4.x kernel is
incomplete. Please apply the patch on

   http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/2.4.7/linux-2.4.7-reclaim.dif

Cheers,
   Trond

Steve

> 
> -- 
> Ragnar Kjorstad
> Big Storage

References:
- Re: Busy inodes after umount
  - From: Tony Gale <gale@syntax.dera.gov.uk>
- Re: Busy inodes after umount
  - From: Ragnar Kjørstad <xfs@ragnark.vestdata.no>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.4.7-xfs from CVS and missing files
Next by Date: [reiserfs-list] A question for a redhat reiserfs user (oh, mysympathies....)
Previous by thread: Re: Busy inodes after umount
Next by thread: Re: Busy inodes after umount
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread