[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New files on xfs ftp site

To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: New files on xfs ftp site
From: ctooley@amoa.org
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:25:22 -0500
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com

So if I want to upgrade to 2.4.5 via building a kernel RPM (I know this seems
odd, but I've got 4 machines running XFS and would just like to keep them
consistent) what all would I have to apply to 2.4.5 code to be able to repace
the 2.4.2 code in the SRPM?

Chris Tooley

"Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@bigfoot.com> on 06/01/2001 07:25:55 AM

  To:          Jochen Scharrlach                              
               <Jochen.Scharrlach@BW.Nextra.De>               

  cc:          linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com(bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA)  

  Subject      Re: New files on xfs ftp site                  
  :                                                           

>> Jochen Scharrlach <Jochen.Scharrlach@BW.Nextra.De> writes:

 >  - are they bleeding-edge CVS code?

 It's taken off the CVS tree and diff'ed against a fresh 2.4.5 tree.  It
 applies cleanly (just checked this to be sure).

 AFAICT (don't take my word for this, I use neither RH nor the SGI
 release) the "1.0" release is 2.4.2 + XFS at that time + "this really
 needs to be fixed" kind of patches.

 HTH,

--
Marcelo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New files on xfs ftp site
  - From: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>

Prev by Date: Re: does it work on 2.4.4
Next by Date: RE: Path failover with xfs on linux
Previous by thread: Re: New files on xfs ftp site
Next by thread: Re: New files on xfs ftp site
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread