[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TAKE - Merge of kiobuf unmerge

To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: TAKE - Merge of kiobuf unmerge
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@thebarn.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 14:07:24 -0400
Cc: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@sgi.com>, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
References: <200104041621.f34GLw828367@gibble.americas.sgi.com> <20010404185720.B2444@gruyere.muc.suse.de>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com

Andi Kleen wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:21:58PM -0400, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> > Back out kiobuf based I/O path
>
> Pity :-(( Hopefully there will be a worthy replacement found in 2.5.

Yes agreed...
Given the controversy around kiobuf's  right now, we felt it best to
disassociate the release of  XFS  from them.

A patch been archived  in the source tree so that we may revive this
work
at the appropriate time.

>
>
> -Andi

--
Russell Cattelan
--
Digital Elves inc. -- Currently on loan to SGI
Linux XFS core developer.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TAKE - Merge of kiobuf unmerge
  - From: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>

References:
- TAKE - Merge of kiobuf unmerge
  - From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@sgi.com>
- Re: TAKE - Merge of kiobuf unmerge
  - From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Which compiler for xfs tools
Next by Date: TAKE - kiobuf patch
Previous by thread: Re: TAKE - Merge of kiobuf unmerge
Next by thread: Re: TAKE - Merge of kiobuf unmerge
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread