Re: Irix and POSIX Extensions?

Bruce Johnson (brucej++at++sgi.com)
Mon, 20 Dec 1999 06:22:05 -0800

• Next message: jjang26++at++hotmail.com: "ÇØÅ·ÇÁ·Î±×·¥,¸ÞÀϹ߼Û,¼öÁýÇÁ·Î±×·¥ ÆË´Ï´Ù."
• Previous message: Geoff Levner: "Re: Suggestions on getting started with Performer"
• In reply to: John D. Jamulla: "Suggestions on getting started with Performer"

Yes - IRIX has been conformant with POSIX 1003.1b (the real-time
extensions) since IRIX 6.2 (under 6.2 one needed the POSIX
patch set).

I believe the 1996 POSIX 1003.1 version is actually a merger of several
POSIX standards - the original API (1003.1-1990), the real-time extentions
(1003.1b-1993), pthreads (1003.1c-1995), and 1003.1i (some slight mods
to 1003.1b). It is my understanding that IRIX is conformant to this as
well.

-- 
Bruce Johnson
brucej++at++sgi.com

• Next message: jjang26++at++hotmail.com: "ÇØÅ·ÇÁ·Î±×·¥,¸ÞÀϹ߼Û,¼öÁýÇÁ·Î±×·¥ ÆË´Ï´Ù."
• Previous message: Geoff Levner: "Re: Suggestions on getting started with Performer"
• In reply to: John D. Jamulla: "Suggestions on getting started with Performer"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Dec 20 1999 - 03:24:02 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.