(no subject)

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Marcin Romaszewicz (marcin++at++asmodean.engr.sgi.com)
Wed, 6 Oct 1999 10:22:20 -0700 (PDT)


On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Bryan Housel wrote:

> Ran Yakir wrote:
> >
> > Actually, you might be able to get away with it. If
> > you write your own sproc()
> > function, that uses pthreads, and returns the right
> > value, the pfQueue will
> > think it has successfully called sproc. Marcin, does
> > the pfQueue use sproc in
> > a more advanced manner ?
>
> I don't know if that will work... If I even try to link in
> libpthread.so, my Performer app won't run.. (at least, under IRIX
> 6.2/6.3)...
>
> Bryan
>

Linking performer and pthreads works fine in 6.5. There was a bug in early
versions of 6.5 which made glx fail to get a context, but that has been
fixed as well. I've successfully run perfly with pthreads linked in.

-- Marcin


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Wed Oct 06 1999 - 10:22:45 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.