Re: Performer C/C++ APIs

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Roy Ruddle (Ruddle++at++cardiff.ac.uk)
Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:21:46 +0100 (BST)


> Are many people doing this, defining both tokens?
Well, I am (as you've probably guessed). All my original PF apps (v1.2)
are written in C++, calling the C API, and my new/modified apps have used
PF's C++ API ever since v2 was released. So 'legacy' is why I have a
mixture, and I really don't want to have to go back and change all the
calls :-(. That would be a big big job (50k - 100k lines of code), and
then I'd have to test it again.

Here's hoping Linux will support both.

roy


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 23 1999 - 00:22:16 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.