Re: pfDataPools and pfNodes

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Angus Dorbie (dorbie++at++sgi.com)
Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:01:33 -0700

This won't work for pfobjects.

There are arcane internal structures Performer creates & uses to keep
the code safe & optimize processing.

Read the manual on pfBuffer, look at the example code supplied and read
the programming guide.

Cheers,ANgus.

ross::barna wrote:
>
> wait! what if i allocated a pfFluxMemory onto the pfDataPool
> using the new(size, void* arena) operator, then allocated the
> node that i want to be in the pool using the new(size, pfFlux
> Memory *fmem)!!!!
>
> that seems like it would get my node into the pool!!!!
>
> i will try it and see what happens....
>
> -ross
>
> On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Angus Dorbie wrote:
>
> =>I don't think I cc'd info-performer, so for everyones benefit, there is
> =>no simple workaround.
> =>
> =>Performer objects must be created in the app or related processes i.e.
> =>the database process.
> =>
> =>Another unrelated application could pass data via shared memory or some
> =>other form of IPC to database or app process and you could create
> =>pfObjects based on that data.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/software/performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

-- 
Never express yourself more clearly than you think.
                                       Neils Bohr 


For advanced 3D graphics Performer + OpenGL based examples and tutors:
http://www.dorbie.com/

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Fri Jul 16 1999 - 13:01:38 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.