Re: the fragment and shadows in mco output

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Angus Dorbie (dorbie++at++sgi.com)
Mon, 26 Apr 1999 10:45:35 -0700

output will be taken from a specific area of framebuffer, taking any two
outputs will pull video from their predetermined desktop region, not
necessarily contiguous. I think the mouse is only muxed to one video
channel (not sure on RE2). The mouse input focus is just the desktop and
has nothing to do with video. It is not entirely clear form your
description what the nature of your problem is. Is the problem your
display or the actual video outputs? If this reply hasn't been of
sufficient help then you should open a call so that it can be
investigated.

Cheers,Angus.

sheng wen wrote:
>
> Dear Sir:
> I'm tian chuan from China,today when I make a experiment with two
> LCD projectors through the onyx MCO,I find some problems:
> (1) there are some shadow in the picture edge, which output from the
> MCO's two channels and are projected on the flat screen.
> (2) when I setmon to 6++at++640x480_60,and only output channel 1 and channel
> 5 signals,the output pictures are fragmented and not continous,e.g.when
> I put the cursor onto a window,it did not highlight,but when I put the
> cursor somewhere outside of the window,the window is highlighted.
>
> could you tell me why?
>
> thank you
>
> tian chuan
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free ++at++yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

-- 
"Microsoft's system was like a forest that hadn't had a controlled
 burn in decades, just waiting for one person with a match to turn
 it into a disaster. Melissa was Microsoft's fault. They left their
 system wide open to this sort of abuse, they knew it could happen
 and did nothing." -- Bruce Perens


For advanced 3D graphics Performer + OpenGL based examples and tutors:
http://www.dorbie.com/

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Apr 26 1999 - 10:45:40 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.