Re: 1999 !

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Michel Chamberland (crakrjak++at++xerxes.com)
Sun, 3 Jan 1999 15:25:12 -0500 (EST)

actully wouldnt that report it to 2002 or 2003?

> But the first decade only had 9 years, so the year 2000
> is really the turn of the millennium...
>
> (Heck if you are _really_ picky Jesus was not born in year
> 1 (or 0) anyway.)
>
> ;-)
>
> ken
>
> At 01:04 PM 1/4/99 , you wrote:
> >> Intrinsic Graphics Inc. wrote:
> >>
> >> Happy new year, the last before the new millennium.
> >
> >No it's not. This is a date, think Fortran not C, 1 is the first
> >index in the array.
> >
> >Cheers,Angus.
> >
> >--
> >"Only the mediocre are always at their best." -- Jean Giraudoux
> >
> >For advanced 3D graphics Performer + OpenGL based examples and tutors:
> >http://www.dorbie.com/
> >=======================================================================
> >List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/software/performer/
> > Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> > Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>
>
> =======================================================================
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/software/performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Jan 04 1999 - 11:53:32 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.