Max Waterman (maxw++at++sgi.com)
Tue, 20 Oct 1998 08:31:58 -0700
IGL on its own, sure, but not the IGL version of performer.
But, again, please check with powers that be. A direct question to i-p
would probably invoke responses from people that know for sure - there
may well be inaccuracies in my understanding of the situation.
Max.
> and visa
> versa. Sure, I'll take a performance hit but I've got plenty to spare.
> What I don't have is loads of time to port my s/w at this time, so I'm
> using IGL for this application because that lets me continue to use the
> user input routines I wrote for IGL.
>
> > Please mention in a follow up email to i-p what hardware you are
> > intending to run the IGL and OGL versions of perfly on.
> IGL on Indigo2 MaxIMPACT (Irix 6.5, PF 2.2.1). I don't intend to run this
> application with OGL for the foreseeable future
>
> regards
>
> roy
>
> =======================================================================
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Tue Oct 20 1998 - 08:37:27 PDT