MPU

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

george williams (gcw++at++best.com)
Wed, 26 Aug 1998 18:49:42 -0700

Next message: Phil Keslin: "Re: MPU"
Previous message: Russell Suter: "[Fwd: Source for pfconv?]"
Next in thread: Phil Keslin: "Re: MPU"
Reply: Phil Keslin: "Re: MPU"
Reply: Brian Cabral: "Re: MPU"
Reply: Angus Dorbie: "Re: MPU"

I hope questions about MPU (MultiPipe Utility) are not out-of-line for
this newsgroup. But, having just read the MPU spec, I am wondering if any
Performers out there have used it. It would *seem* that MPU is equal to
Performer
minus the Performer scene graph. Is this a fair observation?

If you know of a better forum for questions regarding MPU, please reply
personally.
And I apologize if this subject has been addressed in other Performer circles...

Thanx,
George W.
gcw++at++best.com

Next message: Phil Keslin: "Re: MPU"
Previous message: Russell Suter: "[Fwd: Source for pfconv?]"
Next in thread: Phil Keslin: "Re: MPU"
Reply: Phil Keslin: "Re: MPU"
Reply: Brian Cabral: "Re: MPU"
Reply: Angus Dorbie: "Re: MPU"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Wed Aug 26 1998 - 18:48:52 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.