Re: Performer 2.2 "compat" libraries ineffective?

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Alejandro Saez (cano++at++silicon.cl)
Mon, 4 May 1998 19:22:47 -0400

On May 1, 3:54pm, William Sherman -Visualization wrote:
> Subject: Re: Performer 2.2 "compat" libraries ineffective?
> > On May 1, 11:14am, Stuart Levy wrote:
> > >(1) Some apps compiled & linked in a Performer 2.0/2.1 environment refuse
to
> > > find (for example) iv and iv20 loaders, even though the corresponding
> > > libpfiv_ogl.so and libpfiv20_ogl.so libraries exist and are
successfully
> > > opened by the app, according to par(1).
>
> And by the way, odd behaviour was exhibited by more than one application,
> some of which hadn't been compiled in a year or so. And a few of which
> we were given only the executable, so recompiling is not even an option.
>
Remember that you are probably using dynamic loading of the libraries (done by
rld as noted by Marcus) which mean that although you haven't recompiled things
have changed.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alejandro Saez
Software Engineer
Silicon Chile S.A.
                                        Avda. Andres Bello 2777, Of. 602
E-mail: asaez++at++silicon.cl              	Providencia
Phone:  +56 (2) 203 3371 Ext. 105       Santiago
Fax:    +56 (2) 203 3370                Chile
------------------------------------------------------------------------
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:57:22 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.