Re: Compiling -mips3 -n32 with MIPSpro7.2

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Jay Gischer (gischer++at++puget.engr.sgi.com)
Mon, 20 Apr 1998 10:42:41 -0700 (PDT)

Scott McMillan writes:
> Jay suggested I remove the -L/usr/lib32 as well as the mips3 one
> I just added (same as you suggest) but the way
> I had the Makefile set up, it was putting a blank -L argument so
> the linker started complaining about not being able to find every
> library and choosing (incorrectly) the ones in /usr/lib. ACK!
>
> So I finally realized this, removed the offending -L, and
> everything is hunky-dorey now. :)
>
Good. I'm glad to hear it.

> Now I am trying to remember why I had the -L/usr/lib32
> in there in the first place. I am wondering if this is a
> carry over from previous Performer makefiles. If so, has
> this been removed from the Performer 2.2 makefiles? I know
> they have been totally revamped and I have not had time to
> play with them.
>

It appears that in fact the "-mips3 -L/usr/lib32" is still there in
the sample Makefiles.. I wasn't previously aware that O2 platforms
used a mips4 version of certain files by default. So building the
examples with the defaults on an O2 is going to create problems.
Sigh.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jay L Gischer + "I see great things in baseball. It's our game.
Advanced Graphics + It will repair our losses and be a blessing to
Software + us."
Silicon Graphics + -Walt Whitman
(415) 390-4277 +
gischer++at++sgi.com + "A life has no meaning except in the impact it
                     + has on other lives"
                     + -Jackie Robinson

=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:57:16 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.