Re: Performer 2.2 manuals

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Francois Sillion (Francois.Sillion++at++imag.fr)
Wed, 25 Feb 1998 09:47:22 +0100 (MET)


Thanks for the information. However, the performer_tools webtools
are not that easy to install on any system. The release notes state that

       2.4 Prerequisites

       To use the IRIS Performer API Search Tool, you must have
       HTTP Server Software running that has the /var/www/htdocs
       directory as the document root. The server also needs to
       have the /var/www/cgi-bin directory configured to accept
       cgi's. As of IRIX 6.2, all systems come with HTTP Server
       Software preinstalled that use the /var/www/htdocs as the
       document root. The /var/www/cgi-bin directory is also
       configured to accept cgi's. This is the defualt
       configuration. If your system is not configured this wa way,
       you need to consult your system administrator. If you need
       help configuring your HTTP server, please read the
       instructions that came with your HTTP Server Software.

On our systems we are not using HTTP server software at this time. I am not
sure we will want, or be able to, start running it just to access the
Performer API information. In general I believe we try to avoid running any
not-strictly-necessary software on our Onyx2 to maintain performance...

Right now the only working source of documentation is 'man (1)'. This seems
like a real time warp bringing us some years in the past :-) I don't
even know how to print a man page! I really wish
there was a more flexible way to install either a complete Insight book, or
the API search tool... jumping to sgi.com is simply not practical from
France..

By the way, the URL listed in the Insight book
(http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/manuals/3000/007-3632-001/html) produces
the following results:

-----------------------
Not Found

The requested object does not exist on this server. The link you followed is either outdated,
inaccurate, or the server has been instructed not to let you have it.
-----------------------

Sharon Clay wrote:
>
> The API reference guides are on-line in insight and are just API listings and do
> not have the man pages to try to keep them to a short and printable form.
> The general feedback that we got was that including the printed man pages
> was NOT worth the cost in trees :-)
> However, if being able to buy printed man pages seems like a real advantage to many,
> we can add it back as a separate order.
> It'd probably cost around $200 for the set or maybe half that
> for just one. Shocking I know but for these low volume printings of big books it
> isn't cheap. Go to Kinkos to make a copy and it will cost you a whole lot more!
>
> May I also suggest that you check out the API search tool in the performer_tools
> subsystem. This is very handing for checking out and searching API and man pages
> and sample programs, both C and C++.
>
> -----{-----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++
> Sharon Rose Clay - Silicon Graphics, Advanced Systems Dev.
> src++at++sgi.com (650) 933 - 1002 FAX: (650) 965 - 2658 MS 8U-590
> -----{-----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++

+------------------+------------------------------------------------------+
| Francois SILLION | iMAGIS - GRAVIR/IMAG, B.P. 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9|
| ' | France. Tel:+33 4 76 51 43 54 - Fax:+33 4 76 63 55 80|
+------------------+--------+---------------------------------------------+
| Francois.Sillion++at++imag.fr | http://www-imagis.imag.fr/~Francois.Sillion |
+---------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:56:52 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.