Re: Performer 2.2 on High Impact

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Randy Fox (rfox++at++smtp.coryphaeus.com)
Fri, 20 Feb 1998 11:44:23 -0800

Can you use -mips4 on a n32 bit PF2.2 app or does it have to be a n64
compile?

Randy

Angus Dorbie wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 9:09am, vectec.epe wrote:
> > Subject: Performer 2.2 on High Impact
> > Hi All,
> >
> > we upgraded our High Impact (Irix 6.2) to Performer 2.2 and have problems
> > to execute Perfly under n32 (compile: OK, execute: coredumps).
>
> Works fine on my system.
>
> >
> > Hence the question: what are the advantages to work under n32 versus o32 on
> > a High Impact (R4400/250MHz) ?
>
> You get better instruction set support (use -mips3 flag also) and better
> compiler optimizations (register count etc), you should really move to n32.
>
> Use -mips4 for R10k.
>
> Cheers,Angus.
>
> --
> "The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands
> in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he
> stands at times of challenge and controversy."
> -Martin Luther King, Jr.
> =======================================================================
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:56:48 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.