Re: pfconv for Performer 2.1

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Rob Jenkins (robj++at++quid.csd.sgi.com)
Wed, 11 Feb 1998 08:14:29 -0800


There were some problems addressed pf 2.x patches, I would recommend you
install them, see the FAQs off the web page ( www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
) for the full table of version/OS/platform/patches or just upgrade to pf 2.2 (
this is the way to go unless you're constrained to 2.1 for some reason ).
Also check out the recommended patchsets from www.sgi.com/support

Cheers
Rob

On Feb 10, 1:49pm, Linda Rae wrote:
> Subject: pfconv for Performer 2.1
> Good afternoon:
>
> I am trying to convert Multigen 15.4 .flt files to .pfb under Performer
> 2.1, with little luck using pfconv. It was my understanding that there
> was a problem with pfconv in Performer 2.1, and that a patch existed
> somewhere... Is my memory faulty, or can anyone help steer me in the
> direction of a good version of pfconv, or the appropriate patch??
>
> Whatever the problem was, it was fixed in Performer2.2 - I have used
> pfconv and it converts files w/out error.
>
> Thanks much in advance for your replies..
>
> Linda Rae
> =======================================================================
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>-- End of excerpt from Linda Rae

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Rob Jenkins mailto:robj++at++sgi.com
Silicon Graphics, Mtn View, California, USA
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:56:46 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.