Gl error.

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Rob Jenkins (robj++at++quid.csd.sgi.com)
Mon, 2 Feb 1998 13:11:23 -0800


presumably versions long | grep does actually find the loader installed, if so
then the rld options ( described better in man rld ) of:

setenv _RLD_PATH /usr/lib/rld.debug
setenv _RLD_ARGS -v ( or trace )

should give some clue as to what is happening.

Cheers
Rob

On Feb 2, 1:07pm, A. Ballard Andrews wrote:
> Subject:
> Subject: Database Loaders
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> A while back I wrote a Performer loader for
> IBM Visualization Data Explorer's format
> which worked fine for about eight months
> until I upgraded to Performer 2.2 from 2.0.2
> I recompiled the loader of course, but the
> only error message I get is unhelpful in
> pointing me toward the source of the
> trouble: My app can't find the loader,
> despite having the usual PFLD and LD
> environment varialble with the path
> to the loader correctly in place.
> My question:
> What else has changed in 2.2 that I
> don't know about which would make
> my app "blind" to the location of
> the dso 032 version of my loader?
>
> Thanks,
>
> B. Andrews
>
> PS the error message is:
> pfdFindConverterDSO() - Could not load DSO for extension "dx"
>
> NB. I repeat: I am not getting this error because my path
> is not set!
>
> =======================================================================
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>-- End of excerpt from A. Ballard Andrews

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Rob Jenkins mailto:robj++at++sgi.com
Silicon Graphics, Mtn View, California, USA
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:56:42 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.