pfMorph under 2.2

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Kenneth B Russell (kbrussel++at++media.mit.edu)
Fri, 30 Jan 1998 08:38:45 GMT

I saw from the release notes and manual pages that pfMorph is
obsolete. But *should* it work if it's used? The reason I ask is
we reimplemented our morphing code to use pfFlux/pfEngine as in
morph_engine.C, but see garbage: the same sort of garbage, in
fact, that we see if we use our old code which uses the pfMorph
node. I'm afraid we're corrupting memory somewhere in our app,
and our version of purify (4.0.1) hangs in _r4kup_setlock when
run with a Performer application (currently working on getting an
upgrade...)

Thanks for the sanity check,

-Ken

__________________________________________________________________________
Kenneth B. Russell Synthetic Characters Group, MIT Media Lab
kbrussel++at++media.mit.edu http://www.media.mit.edu/~kbrussel
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:56:39 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.