Re: Performer 2.2 on High Impact

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Angus Dorbie (dorbie++at++multipass.engr.sgi.com)
Thu, 29 Jan 1998 04:03:47 -0800

Next message: Knobel,Markus, NA-A: "problem with the lighting of a pfb database"
Previous message: Mario Veraart: "Problem with the lighting of a database"

On Jan 29, 9:09am, vectec.epe wrote:
> Subject: Performer 2.2 on High Impact
> Hi All,
>
> we upgraded our High Impact (Irix 6.2) to Performer 2.2 and have problems
> to execute Perfly under n32 (compile: OK, execute: coredumps).

Works fine on my system.

>
> Hence the question: what are the advantages to work under n32 versus o32 on
> a High Impact (R4400/250MHz) ?

You get better instruction set support (use -mips3 flag also) and better
compiler optimizations (register count etc), you should really move to n32.

Use -mips4 for R10k.

Cheers,Angus.

-- 
"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands
in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he
stands at times of challenge and controversy."
                             -Martin Luther King, Jr.
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

Next message: Knobel,Markus, NA-A: "problem with the lighting of a pfb database"
Previous message: Mario Veraart: "Problem with the lighting of a database"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:56:38 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.