Re: Polygon per seconds

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

WILLIAM_MARINELLI++at++ntsc.navy.mil
Wed, 28 Jan 98 09:59:00 EST

     Good question, but very difficult to answer depending on the nature of
     the polygon. One could look read a number off the spec sheet, and the
     spec sheet specify whether the benchmark was arrived at by rendering
     a mesh or not. Then again, there could be a fill issue (a deck of
     cards where the top card fills up a significant amount of screen
     space) where the geometry processing is bored but raster generation
     process is taxed. Lo ciento que tengo que estar una caca en el tazon
     de ponche.

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Polygon per seconds
Author: Mike Chamberland <mike++at++xerxesinc.com> at SMTPLINK-NTSC
Date: 1/27/98 6:13 PM

Hi, im using Performer for irix and i am wondering what kind of polygons
per seconds rate i should expect from an O2 r5000, and an Octane dual
r10000. thanks in advance.
      
                                                            Michel
Chamberland
      
http://www.xerxesinc.com
      
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:56:37 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.