Re: pfFont in 2.1 ... nasty, nasty !

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Rémi Arnaud (remi++at++remi.engr.sgi.com)
Tue, 20 Jan 1998 11:51:47 -0800 (PST)


Jean-Luc Dery wrote:
>
> The GOOD, the BAD and the UGLY ... this is not a joke !
>
> I've been trying to use pfFont for quite a while now and have always had memory
> corruption problems . But I think I finally found the problem. My hypothesis is
> the following:
>
> There are two versions of the pfFont.h file; a GOOD pfFont.h used by Perfomer
> to build their libraries and a BAD one that's in the Pf 2.1 developper's
> distribution.

 You are right, this has been fixed in 2.2. (reference pfBug 3044)

    _ / _ _
|_) _ ._ _ o /\ |_)|\ | /\ | || \
| \(/_| | || /--\| \| \|/--\|_||_/
                                           
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:56:35 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.