Fagan, Tim (tim.fagan++at++dsto.defence.gov.au)
Thu, 18 Dec 1997 11:38:03 +1030
> As far as I know, but I am not a specialist on that, Windows 9x/NT
> does
> not provide any equivalent of locking a CPU or having non degradable
> realtime process priorities that prevent the system to take time over
> the
> application.
There are now third party extensions to NT that will provide greater
real-time-ness, but I don't know enough about their performance to offer
advice.
> Is it that the meaning of RealTime changes when we deal with PC ? Are
> final customers happy with uncontrolable frame drops ? Or is there
> other
> ways to ensure RealTime with NT ?
I believe that there is a real time version of linux that is
very good.
===========================================================
_--_|\ Tim Fagan [Tim.Fagan++at++dsto.defence.gov.au]
/ DSTO \ Air Operations Division
\_.--._/ Defence Science & Technology Organisation
v Fax : 61-3-626 7093 Voice: 61-3-626 7222
#include <std_employer_disclacimer.hpp>
"Smoke me a kipper... I'll be back for breakfast"-Ace Rimmer
===========================================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:56:27 PDT