Rémi Arnaud (remi++at++remi)
Wed, 17 Dec 1997 10:42:42 -0800 (PST)
I'd like someone to explain how is it possible to write a RealTime
application without a RealTime operating system ?
As far as I know, but I am not a specialist on that, Windows 9x/NT does
not provide any equivalent of locking a CPU or having non degradable
realtime process priorities that prevent the system to take time over the
application.
Is it that the meaning of RealTime changes when we deal with PC ? Are
final customers happy with uncontrolable frame drops ? Or is there other
ways to ensure RealTime with NT ?
>
> So ... any hints to see the futur clearer ?
>
> Cedric
> Cedric Gautier - THOMSON - tel:33(0)141480352 fax:33(0)141480681
> Simulation Department - 3D Computer Graphics and Virtual Reality
> gce++at++syseca.fr or www.syseca.thomson-csf.com/english/cha1/SDA.HTM
> SYSECA / 66-68 avenue Pierre Brossolette 92240 MALAKOFF / FRANCE
> =======================================================================
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>
_ / _ _
|_) _ ._ _ o /\ |_)|\ | /\ | || \
| \(/_| | || /--\| \| \|/--\|_||_/
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:56:27 PDT