Re: Simple Cull Question

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Dr Colin Bridgewater (crccobr++at++nocrc.abb.no)
Thu, 20 Nov 1997 15:47:21 +0100


Hi Michael

Michael T. Jones wrote:
> 2. disable geometric cull testing for that node **AND ALL
> OF IT'S PARENTS UP TO THE ROOT**. this is necessarially
> so since the cull testing is hierarchical in nature.

Just curious about why Steve used PFTRAV_CONT and not PFTRAV_PRUNE to
alter the behaviour of the cull traversal. Otherwise his answer to the
original posting was very helpful, as per usual.

The reason I asked was because the node in question may be a group node
representing an assembly of components. If so, there will be a lot of
child nodes to leave alone as well. I wasn't too sure what would happen
in that case and so thought PFTRAV_PRUNE might have been better than
writing a node traversal function for each child as well.

> Not a good flag to set on the root node, methinks.

Just my warped sense of humour, I'm afraid. Should have put a smiley or
something after it (grin).

Regards

Colin

PS I don't have access to a machine to try things out on at the moment
so I'm really just thinking out loud.....
_______________________________________________________________________
Dr Colin Bridgewater crccobr++at++nocrc.abb.no Marine Oil and Gas Dept
ABB Teknologi AS, Bergerveien 12, PO Box 91, N-1361 BILLINGSTAD, Norway
work tel: +47 66 84 35 36, fax: +47 66 84 35 41, home: +44 1189 671713
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:56:13 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.