Re: more taboo questions

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Mario Veraart (rioj7++at++fel.tno.nl)
Fri, 31 Oct 1997 15:51:04 +0100 (MET)

Next message: Mario Veraart: "Re: Returning modified data from a forked ISECT test"
Previous message: Jason Williams: "Re: Beta . ??s"
In reply to: Mike Montegut: "Beta . ??s"

> I heard rumours saying SGI stations could someday work under Windows NT. Like
> every rumour, this might be completely wrong:-) But...in case this came to be
> true, would there be a chance to see Performer one day ported to NT? Some
> people seem to hold this for quite unlikely...

As far as I know WinNT performs very bad on machines that have more than 4 CPUs.
SGI might try to port WinNT to single CPU machines, but why try to
support two OSs on you platform if one is already a big job.

Mario
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

Next message: Mario Veraart: "Re: Returning modified data from a forked ISECT test"
Previous message: Jason Williams: "Re: Beta . ??s"
In reply to: Mike Montegut: "Beta . ??s"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:56:09 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.