Re: Performer vs Optimizer

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Angus Dorbie (dorbie++at++multipass.engr.sgi.com)
Fri, 19 Sep 1997 08:15:55 -0700

On Sep 19, 8:18pm, Y.Kanou wrote:
> Subject: Performer vs Optimizer
> I have read "OpenGL Optimizer Programmer's Guide". Very nice. Optimizer
> have excellent functionalities which Performer doesn't have, such as
> "occlusion culling", "simplifier". But I can't see any App-Cull-Draw style
> multi-processing support in it though it has some multi-processing-related
> classes.
>
> So my question is: are there any criteria about which we should choose
> between Performer and Optimizer?

Optimizer does suppotd Multiprocessing, axactly how is uncleare to my.
But it even exploits MP on NT machines.

In anycase, Rob Jenkins has just posted an excellent comparrison
by Brian Cabral, didn't you read that?

Cheers,Angus.
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:55:57 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.