Re: about DG5 outputs

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Daniel Banek (daniel++at++daniel.karlsruhe.sgi.com)
Mon, 18 Aug 1997 13:40:34 -0600

On Aug 18, 10:18am, YAMANAKA MASAHIKO wrote:
> Subject: about DG5 outputs
> Sorry, this is not a Performer question, but there are many iR(DG5) users
> in this ML, so please let me ask a simple question about DG5...
>
> One DG5 board has (2or8) outputs + some composite outputs.
> Some composite outputs are internaly same, aren't they?
>
> So my question is, if I use DG5-8, can I use 8+1=9 outputs simultaneously?
>
> When I used ircombine on iR before, I saw [Encoder] button beside [Channel]
> buttons (Currently, I don't use iR and cannot confirm this).
>
> Thanks,
> --
> M.Y.
> =======================================================================
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>-- End of excerpt from YAMANAKA MASAHIKO

No sorry, encoder channel is channel 1. Only 8 channels simultaniously.

regards

daniel

-- 
                                        +---------------------------------+
                                        |  Daniel Banek                   |
      __      ____    __          * __  |  Projectmanager High-End Graphic|
 /\  / / /| /  /     /_//\  /| / / /    |  SiliconGraphics Germany        |
/_/ /_/ / |/  /     /  /--\/ |/ / /_    |  email: panic++at++karlsruhe.sgi.com |
                                        |  Mailstop: IDE-3170 VM 332 8931 |
                                        +---------------------------------+
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:55:45 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.