Re: 3DS loader in Performer 2.1

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Mario Veraart (rioj7++at++fel.tno.nl)
Tue, 15 Jul 1997 19:18:45 +0200 (MET DST)


> Has anyone used the 3DS loader in Performer? If so, how did you get
> the loader into Performer? I've located the proper library (libpf3ds.so),
> which has a link to the right version, but when I try to read in a 3ds
> file I get:
>
> pfdFindConverterDSO() - Could not load DSO for extension "3ds"
> pfdFindConverterDSO() - Could not load DSO for extension "3ds"
> pfdLoadFile() - Unable to load file man1.3ds because of problem finding
> pfdLoadFile_3ds
>
> I'm able to read dwb, flt, obj,... files, but no 3ds. Any ideas?

Rob Jenkins wrote a mail with a possible explanation on 11 Jul 1996

=====================================================================
Subject: Re: C++ API
From: "Rob Jenkins" <robj++at++barney.reading.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 14:47:47 +0100
To: Ion Barosan <I.Barosan++at++urc.tue.nl>, info-performer++at++sgi.com

On Jul 11, 2:52pm, Ion Barosan wrote:
> Subject: C++ API
> My question is, why does the pfdFindConverterDSO not find the pfdLoadFile_3ds
function ?
>

Ian

You could check you've installed il_eoe.sw.c

( NOTE elfdump -Dl /usr/lib/libpfdb/libpf3ds_igl.so shows that it links to
libcil.so which is in il_eoe.sw.c and isn't always installed ).

Cheers
Rob

--
________________________________________________________________
Rob Jenkins, Software Support Group, Silicon Graphics UK Ltd.
Forum 1, Station Road, Theale, Reading, UK, RG7 4SB.
tel 01734 257736, fax 01734 257553, email robj++at++reading.sgi.com,

======================================================================= List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/ Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:55:36 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.