Re: RE:Q: pfLayerModes

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Jean BENOIT (vsm_mrs++at++compuserve.com)
Mon, 16 Jun 1997 05:02:00 -0400

Next message: Jean BENOIT: "Any known problems with Performer on RE IIs?"
Previous message: Jean BENOIT: "RE:Flickering subfaces on IR - Loader Problem?"

You have a difference between pfDECAL_BASE_STENCIL and HIGH_QUALITY if yo=
u
have a very large database, or multilayers.
but I think you have to put the option only on layer nodes. So try to fin=
d
the layer node by a traversal function or pfConverterAttr fct , and add t=
o
the GState the function
pfGStateMode(State,PFSTATE_DECAL,PFDECAL_HIGH_QUALITY)
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
   SGI DevForum 97 info: http://www.sgi.com/Forum97/

Next message: Jean BENOIT: "Any known problems with Performer on RE IIs?"
Previous message: Jean BENOIT: "RE:Flickering subfaces on IR - Loader Problem?"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:55:26 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.