Re: Memory problems after application crash

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Avi (avi++at++zombie.com)
Tue, 03 Jun 1997 23:45:38 -0700


With 5.3, we saw OS (memory, file-locks) corruption after certain severe
pipe crashes. The only course of action was big-booting the system. I've
seen some similar (what I assume is) OS or pipe-state corruption with
6.4 which manifest as persistent frame-rate and I/O chuggyness that only
goes away on big-re-boote'.

Best course of action: don't crash.
("Doctor, my elbow hurts when I raise it over my head...")

Avi

Sharon Clay wrote:

> +>---- On Jun 2, 3:36pm, ken sartor wrote:
> > Subject: Memory problems after application crash
> ->
> ->I have a Performer application that occasionally dies ungracefully.
> ->Aside from *that* problem however is the problem that when this
> ->happens, it does not free up memory. Is there a way to free up
>
> System and OS version?
>
> Also, are you sure that when you did the osview test, there were
> no lingering processes from the process group? By default,
> IRIX doesn't return memory to the system until all are dead.
> Freed memory is returned to yourself for you to reuse.
>
> src.
>
> --
> -----{-----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++
>
> Sharon Rose Clay (Fischler) - Silicon Graphics, Advanced Systems Dev.
> src++at++sgi.com (415) 933 - 1002 FAX: (415) 965 - 2658 MS 8U-590
> -----{-----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++ -----{----{---++at++
>
> =======================================================================
>
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
> SGI DevForum 97 info: http://www.sgi.com/Forum97/

=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
   SGI DevForum 97 info: http://www.sgi.com/Forum97/


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:55:24 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.