Re: pfDelete problem, again

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Masanori Kakimoto (kaki++at++kaki.nsg.sgi.com)
Tue, 6 May 1997 14:53:07 +0900

Thank you, Gan.

By simply inserting a pfFrame() in the same loop as pfDelete, it works.
It seems that actual freeing is done in pfFrame.

On May 3, 11:26am, Gan Wang wrote:
> Subject: Re: pfDelete problem, again
> You didn't call a single pfFrame() in your program, and that is where Performer
> does many magical and critical things, including bookkeeping on the scene graph
> and pfMemory. While pfDelete tries to honor reference counts, I don't know how
> Performer would handle this without a pfFrame. Anyone knows?
>
> Gan

-- 
Masanori Kakimoto                    mailto:kaki++at++nsg.sgi.com
East Asia Technology Network, Tokyo Center
c/o Nihon Silicon Graphics Cray
Tel:81-3-5488-1852  Fax:81-3-5420-2397
Voice mail: (external)81-3-5488-1863-1119 (internal)822-1119
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:55:11 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.