Rob Jenkins (robj++at++quid)
Thu, 1 May 1997 15:46:16 -0700
They are
> 2) Which of the patches do we use? From the documentation we are
> thinking we should use 1696 for the eoe and 1392 for the dev.
Correct
> 3) Is the '2.2' you mention the next version of the Performer
> Libraries and if so any word on availability?
>
It is, I don't know a date, but it's in Beta test at the moment so 'soon'.
Allan Schaffer posted some FAQ on the pf patches earlier and updated the FAQ
under the performer web page http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
Cheers
Rob
> Thanks
> Scott
>
> On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Rémi Arnaud wrote:
>
> > It should work. Do you have the performer patches installed ?
> >
> > Note that the bin #2 is the LightPoint Bin in 2.2, and there will
> > be a pfGetChanFreeBin(chan) that will give you the next available
> > bin for the current channel.
> >
> > _ / _ _
> > |_) _ ._ _ o /\ |_)|\ | /\ | || \
> > | \(/_| | || /--\| \| \|/--\|_||_/
> >
> >
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>-- End of excerpt from Scott A Rothermel
-- ________________________________________________________________ Rob Jenkins mailto:robj++at++csd.sgi.com Silicon Graphics, Mtn View, California, USA
===================================List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/ Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:55:11 PDT