Re: Performer Memory Question

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Chris Mitchell (chris++at++scotch.physics.ucla.edu)
Mon, 28 Apr 1997 15:19:13 -0700 (PDT)

Next message: Jason Williams: "(Fwd) C++ subclassing pfNode types."
Previous message: Timothy Moore: "Re: Performer Memory Question"
In reply to: Steven Lovelady: "Performer Memory Question"
Next in thread: Timothy Moore: "Re: Performer Memory Question"

> >I am asking for two reasons. First, if I use Method #1 will all of
> >the processes be able to see all of the members of the structure?
>
> Yes
>
> >Second, does the pfNewGState function do anything special to allocate
>
> >the memory for the GeoState or will it be ok if it is allocated as
> >part of the structure?
>
> All performer nodes are allocated in shared arena. So, method #2 will be
> also work.

This doesn't work for pfMultiProcess(PFMP_APPCULLDRAW|PFMP_FORK_DBASE),
does it?

Chris Mitchell
UCLA Physics Department
LAPD Plasma Lab
310-206-1772
chrism++at++ucla.edu
http://scotch.physics.ucla.edu/~chris

=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

Next message: Jason Williams: "(Fwd) C++ subclassing pfNode types."
Previous message: Timothy Moore: "Re: Performer Memory Question"
In reply to: Steven Lovelady: "Performer Memory Question"
Next in thread: Timothy Moore: "Re: Performer Memory Question"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:55:07 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.