Q: Performer/Library version numbering: -set_version.

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Mark Baranowski (baranowski++at++marklynn.demon.co.uk)
Fri, 11 Apr 1997 14:31:17 GMT

Hi,

I asked this question once before as an aside in another posting, but
got no response. So I'm trying again.

Can anyone explain the meaning of the different DSO/library versions
(as used with the -set_version option to ld).

I am specifically interested in how they relate to Performer releases
(i.e. is sgi3.0 Performer 2.1, sgi2.0 Performer 2.0 etc?). Do I need
to use them if I am writing my own libraries? If so what convention
should I follow?

TIA.

Mark.

-- 
Mark Baranowski at work (baranowski++at++marklynn.demon.co.uk)
Pera, VR Division. Melton Mowbray, Leics. LE13 0PB. UK.
Tel: +44 (0)1664 501501, Fax: +44 (0)1664 501553
All opinions expressed are my own and should not be viewed
as representing my employer unless stated otherwise.
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Performer/
            Submissions:  info-performer++at++sgi.com
        Admin. requests:  info-performer-request++at++sgi.com

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 17:55:03 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.